Warren v. Hodge
This text of 121 Mass. 106 (Warren v. Hodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is too well settled to require discussion or reference to authorities, that an agreement to forbear to sue upon a debt already due and payable, for no other consideration than the payment of part of the debt, is without legal consideration, and cannot be availed of by the debtor, either by way of contract or of estoppel.
Of the cases cited for the defendant, Harris v. Brooks, 21 Pick. 195, was a case of a surety, and Fleming v. Gilbert, 3 Johns. 528, a case of modification by agreement of the way of performing an obligation to discharge a mortgage.
Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
121 Mass. 106, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-v-hodge-mass-1876.