Warren v. Forest Lawn Cemetery & Mausoleum

222 A.D.2d 1059, 635 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14116
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 1995·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment dismissing the fraud cause of action. Plaintiff is not a proper party to allege fraud because no misrepresentation was made to him, nor did he allege that he relied on any misrepresentation. Rather, the complaint alleges that defendant Warren misrepresented to defendant Forest Lawn Cemetery and Mausoleum that plaintiff had consented to the disinterment of his mother’s remains (see, Orlin v Torf, 126 AD2d 252, 254, lv denied 70 NY2d 605). Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Joslin, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Denman, P. J., Green, Fallon, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warren v. Forest Lawn Cemetery & Mausoleum, 222 A.D.2d 1059, 635 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14116 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

222 A.D.2d 1059 (Warren v. Forest Lawn Cemetery & Mausoleum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dreamco Dev. Corp. v. Empire State Dev. Corp.
2021 NY Slip Op 00952 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. BDO Seidman, L. L. P.
746 N.E.2d 1042 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
Fromer v. Yogel
50 F. Supp. 2d 227 (S.D. New York, 1999)