Warren v. Baldwin Union Free School District

281 A.D.2d 413, 721 N.Y.S.2d 289, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2046
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 5, 2001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Phelan, J.), entered June 9, 2000, which granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint and denied his cross motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff failed to timely serve a notice of claim (see, Mills v County of Monroe, 59 NY2d 307, cert denied 464 US 1018; Hibbert v Suffolk County Dept. of Probation, 267 AD2d 205). Moreover, the plaintiffs cross motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim was made more than one year and 90 days after the accrual date of the claim (see, General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; § 50-i). Therefore, the Supreme Court did not have authority to grant the cross motion (see, General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; Hibbert v Suffolk County Dept. of Probation, supra; Matter of Turner v New York City Hous. Auth., 243 AD2d 636; Carr v City of New York, 176 AD2d 779). O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warren v. Baldwin Union Free School District, 281 A.D.2d 413, 721 N.Y.S.2d 289, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2046 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

281 A.D.2d 413 (Warren v. Baldwin Union Free School District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Santiago v. City of New York
282 A.D.2d 596 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)