Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Santiago v. City of New York

Santiago v. City of New York

282 A.D.2d 596, 722 N.Y.S.2d 914, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3784
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 16, 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D.2d 596 (Santiago v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santiago v. City of New York, 282 A.D.2d 596, 722 N.Y.S.2d 914, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3784 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for conversion, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated May 5, 2000, which granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint on the [597]*597ground that the plaintiff failed to timely serve a notice of claim (see, Warren v Baldwin Union Free School Dist., 281 AD2d 413). O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Warren v. Baldwin Union Free School District
281 A.D.2d 413 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
282 A.D.2d 596, 722 N.Y.S.2d 914, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santiago-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2001.