Santiago v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Santiago v. City of New York

282 A.D.2d 596, 722 N.Y.S.2d 914, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3784

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 16, 2001·Published

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for conversion, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated May 5, 2000, which granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint on the [597] ground that the plaintiff failed to timely serve a notice of claim (see, Warren v Baldwin Union Free School Dist., 281 AD2d 413). O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for conversion, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated May 5, 2000, which granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the complaint on the [597] ground that the plaintiff failed to timely serve a notice of claim (see, Warren v Baldwin Union Free School Dist., 281 AD2d 413). O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Santiago v. City of New York, 282 A.D.2d 596, 722 N.Y.S.2d 914, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3784 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

282 A.D.2d 596 (Santiago v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related