Warren

Court of Claims

Warren

503 F.2d 1406, 205 Ct. Cl. 823, 1974 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 38

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedJuly 10, 1974

DocketNo. 491-73

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 503 F.2d 1406 (Warren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Warren, 503 F.2d 1406, 205 Ct. Cl. 823, 1974 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 38 (cc 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Contracts; pleading and practice; real party in interest.— On July 10, 1974 the court issued the following order:

Before Davis, Judge, Presiding, Kunzig and Bennett, Judges.

“This ‘independent action’ under Buie 152 (b) to set aside the decision in Chris Berg, Inc. v. United States, 197 Ct.Cl. 503, 455 F.2d 1037 (1972), on the basis that it was fraudulently arrived at, comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the petition. Upon consideration of the briefs and without oral argument, the court concludes that the motion should be granted since plaintiff does not constitute the ‘real party in interest’ to this dispute. Merritt v. United States, 267 U.S. 338, 340-41 (1925); Putnam Mills Corp. v. United States, 202 Ct.Cl. 1,8, 479 F.2d 1334, 1337 (1973). The court further concludes that, in any case, plaintiff’s petition fails to describe an actionable claim of fraud under Buie 152(b).

[824]*824“it is therefore ordered that defendant’s motion to dismiss be and the saihe is granted'and the petition is dismissed.”

On December 23,1974, plaintiff’s petition for writ of cer-tiorari was denied, 419 U.S. 1089.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Contracts; pleading and practice; real party in interest.— On July 10, 1974 the court issued the following order:

Before Davis, Judge, Presiding, Kunzig and Bennett, Judges.

“This ‘independent action’ under Buie 152 (b) to set aside the decision in Chris Berg, Inc. v. United States, 197 Ct.Cl. 503, 455 F.2d 1037 (1972), on the basis that it was fraudulently arrived at, comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the petition. Upon consideration of the briefs and without oral argument, the court concludes that the motion should be granted since plaintiff does not constitute the ‘real party in interest’ to this dispute. Merritt v. United States, 267 U.S. 338, 340-41 (1925); Putnam Mills Corp. v. United States, 202 Ct.Cl. 1,8, 479 F.2d 1334, 1337 (1973). The court further concludes that, in any case, plaintiff’s petition fails to describe an actionable claim of fraud under Buie 152(b).

[824]*824“it is therefore ordered that defendant’s motion to dismiss be and the saihe is granted'and the petition is dismissed.”

On December 23,1974, plaintiff’s petition for writ of cer-tiorari was denied, 419 U.S. 1089.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

503 F.2d 1406, 205 Ct. Cl. 823, 1974 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warren-cc-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack