Warnke v. Warnke
This text of 2011 ND 212 (Warnke v. Warnke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 11/15/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2011 ND 209
James Ray Coffman, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20110130
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Frank L. Racek, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Kent M. Morrow, P.O. Box 2155, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-2155, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Ryan J. Younggren (argued), Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee.
Coffman v. State
[¶1] James Coffman appeals from the trial court’s order for judgment dismissing his application for post-conviction relief filed on January 25, 2011. (footnote: 0) On appeal, Coffman argues his trial counsel was ineffective because counsel allegedly refused to take the case to trial, failed to interview a police officer whose testimony would exonerate Coffman, and failed to procure Coffman’s phone records. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
FOOTNOTES
0:
ン Generally, this Court will not review an appeal from an order for judgment; however, we will review an appeal if a consistent final judgment is subsequently entered. Alerus Fin., N.A. v. W. State Bank , 2008 ND 104, 15, 750 N.W.2d 412. In this case, final judgment was entered on October 19, 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2011 ND 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warnke-v-warnke-nd-2011.