North Dakota Statutes
§ 31-11-03 — Disputable presumptions
North Dakota § 31-11-03
This text of North Dakota § 31-11-03 (Disputable presumptions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
N.D. Cent. Code § 31-11-03 (2026).
Text
All presumptions other than those set forth in section 31-11-02 are satisfactory if uncontradicted. They are denominated disputable presumptions and may be contradicted by other evidence. The following are of that kind:
1.That a person is innocent of crime or wrong.
2.That an unlawful act was done with an unlawful intent.
3.That a person intends the ordinary consequences of that person's voluntary act.
4.That a person takes ordinary care of that person's own concerns.
5.That evidence willfully suppressed would be adverse if produced.
6.That higher evidence would be adverse if inferior is produced.
7.That money paid by one to another was due the latter.
8.That a thing delivered by one to another was due the latter.
9.That an obligation delivered up to the debtor has been paid.
10.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Orr
375 N.W.2d 171 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1985)
State v. Dvorak
2000 ND 6 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2000)
Kobilansky v. Liffrig
358 N.W.2d 781 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1984)
Austin v. Towne
1997 ND 59 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1997)
Erickson v. Director, North Dakota Department of Transportation
507 N.W.2d 537 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1993)
First Trust Co. of North Dakota v. Conway
375 N.W.2d 160 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1985)
State v. Tininenko
371 N.W.2d 762 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1985)
Thorson v. Thorson
541 N.W.2d 692 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1996)
Salter v. Hjelle
415 N.W.2d 801 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1987)
State v. Zimmerman
516 N.W.2d 638 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1994)
American Insurance Co. v. Midwest Motor Express, Inc.
554 N.W.2d 182 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1996)
City of Jamestown v. Neumiller
2000 ND 11 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2000)
Opdahl v. Zeeland Public School District No. 4
512 N.W.2d 444 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1994)
Stenehjem, ex rel. v. National Audubon Society, Inc.
2014 ND 71 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2014)
Rojas v. Workforce Safety & Insurance
2005 ND 147 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2005)
State v. Egan
1999 ND 59 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1999)
State v. Wolff
512 N.W.2d 670 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1994)
Keating v. Keating
399 N.W.2d 872 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1987)
City of Grafton v. Swanson
497 N.W.2d 421 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1993)
Becker v. Burleigh County
2019 ND 68 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2019)
Nearby Sections
15
§ 31-01-02
Competency of husband or wife as witness - Communications made during marriage - Exceptions§ 31-01-04
When husband or wife may testify to transactions and conversations had with deceased spouse§ 31-01-06.4
General rule of privilege§ 31-01-06.5
Who may claim the privilege§ 31-01-06.6
Exceptions to the privilegeCite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
North Dakota § 31-11-03, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/statute/nd/31-11-03.