Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Warner v. State

Warner v. State

167 S.W. 1109, 74 Tex. Crim. 209, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 586
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 20, 1914
DocketNo. 3130.
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 167 S.W. 1109 (Warner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Warner v. State, 167 S.W. 1109, 74 Tex. Crim. 209, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 586 (Tex. 1914).

Opinions

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This conviction was for simple assault. The recognizance fails to recite the punishment assessed against appellant. Upon this ground the Assistant Attorney General moves to dismiss the appeal. Under the legislative prescribed form it is necessary to state the amount of the punishment in order to make a recognizance sufficient. The authorities are quite numerous, but unnecessary here to mention, which sustain the motion to dismiss.

Because the recognizance is insufficient in the respect mentioned, the appeal will be dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aguilar v. State
810 S.W.2d 230 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Ex Parte Chance
601 S.W.2d 356 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Ex Parte Legg
571 S.W.2d 930 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Irlbeck v. State
40 S.W.2d 124 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Bowman v. State
192 S.W.2d 769 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 S.W. 1109, 74 Tex. Crim. 209, 1914 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/warner-v-state-texcrimapp-1914.