Ex Parte Legg

571 S.W.2d 930, 1978 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1330
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 18, 1978
Docket59100
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 571 S.W.2d 930 (Ex Parte Legg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ex Parte Legg, 571 S.W.2d 930, 1978 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1330 (Tex. 1978).

Opinion

OPINION

DALLY, Judge.

This is a post conviction writ of habeas corpus proceeding. Art. 11.07, V.A. C.C.P. The petitioner was convicted on June 18,1970, in Taylor County for committing the offense of burglary, in Cause No. 10.566A. The indictment alleges that the offense was committed on or about the 5th day of June, 1970, but the indictment was returned and filed on the 8th day of May, 1970. Since the date alleged is an impossible date the indictment is fundamentally defective. See Moreno v. State, 375 S.W.2d 309 (Tex.Cr.App.1964); Chadwick v. State, 252 S.W.2d 165 (Tex.Cr.App.1952); Carver v. State, 90 Tex.Cr.R. 342, 235 S.W. 211 (1921); Warner v. State, 74 Tex.Cr.R. 209, 167 S.W. 1109 (1914). The validity of a fundamentally defective indictment may be challenged in a post conviction writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Fontenot, 550 S.W.2d 87 (Tex.Cr.App.1977).

Although the appellant has served the sentence imposed in Cause No. 10,566A, he is now imprisoned by the Department of Corrections serving time on subsequent sentences. The petitioner alleged that the relief he seeks is not moot because the collateral consequences of his conviction “adversely affect his prospects for pardon and parole and his classification and treatment in prison.” Mootness cannot prohibit a collateral attack if prior convictions that have been discharged may have serious collateral *932 consequences to a criminal defendant. Ex parte Guzman, 551 S.W.2d 387 (Tex.Cr.App. 1977).

The relief sought is granted. The conviction in Cause No. 10,566A in Taylor County is set aside and the indictment is ordered dismissed.

DOUGLAS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Bradley Harold Andrews
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2014
Ex Parte Canada
754 S.W.2d 660 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Busselman v. State
713 S.W.2d 711 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Ex Parte Ormsby
676 S.W.2d 130 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1984)
Carberry v. State
663 S.W.2d 595 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Ex Parte Ridley
658 S.W.2d 177 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1983)
Ex Parte Pierce
621 S.W.2d 634 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)
Ex parte Moses
600 S.W.2d 936 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Ex Parte Chance
601 S.W.2d 356 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Legg v. State
594 S.W.2d 429 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Ex Parte Morse
591 S.W.2d 904 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Ex Parte Buchanan
588 S.W.2d 596 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
571 S.W.2d 930, 1978 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ex-parte-legg-texcrimapp-1978.