Warner v. Morin

13 Mo. 455
Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided July 15, 1850·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

BIRCH, J.

It is unnecessary to further state the nature or condition of this ease, than that as the counsel for the appellee has made the point so often passed upon by this court, its judgment must be rendered accordingly. Our jurisdiction of the case being appellate (purely), we are of course unauthorized to consider anything as a ground for reviewing a proceeding or a judgment here, which was not brought properly to the notice, and hence not finally passed upon by the court below, either in the motion for a new trial, if the alleged errors have relation to proceedings during the trial, or in arrest of udgment if going to the pleadings. The judgment of the court below is therer ore left unreviewed, and consequently affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warner v. Morin, 13 Mo. 455 (Mo. 1850).

13 Mo. 455 (Warner v. Morin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of St. Louis v. Senter Commission Co.
102 S.W.2d 103 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1937)
Dunlap v. Kelly
109 S.W. 793 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1908)
Walter v. Scofield
67 S.W. 276 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1902)
Lilly v. Menke
28 S.W. 643 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)
Danforth v. Lindell Railway Co.
27 S.W. 715 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)
McClintock v. Central Bank
24 S.W. 1052 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1894)
Kurz v. Turley
54 Mo. App. 237 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1893)
Dobyns v. Rice
22 Mo. App. 448 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1886)
Erdbruegger v. Meier
14 Mo. App. 258 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1883)