Warner v. Hare

26 A. 240, 154 Pa. 548, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 935
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 3, 1893·No. Appeal, No. 253·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

All of the material specifications of error are to the findings of fact by the master. We are not convinced that the learned master has committed any substantial error in this respect, or that he has found any fact without evidence, or without sufficient evidence to submit to a jury.

The decree is affirmed, and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warner v. Hare, 26 A. 240, 154 Pa. 548, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 935 (Pa. 1893).

26 A. 240 (Warner v. Hare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Belmont Laboratories, Inc. v. Heist
151 A. 15 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1930)
McCloskey v. North Penn Bank
113 A. 371 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
Scranton v. Scranton Coal Co.
100 A. 813 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1917)
Penn Bank's Assigned Estate
30 A. 1020 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1895)