McCloskey v. North Penn Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

McCloskey v. North Penn Bank

113 A. 371, 270 Pa. 284, 1921 Pa. LEXIS 376

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 18, 1921

DocketAppeal, No. 388

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 113 A. 371 (McCloskey v. North Penn Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McCloskey v. North Penn Bank, 113 A. 371, 270 Pa. 284, 1921 Pa. LEXIS 376 (Pa. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The judgment in this case is affirmed on the opinion of the court below; see also,Union National Bank v. Iron Co., 3 Sadler 58; Lancaster County National Bank v. Huver, 114 Pa. 216, where, at page 219 of the latter, the distinction between decisions in which the rights of third parties have intervened and those concerning the rights of the original parties; is recognized; and, as bearing on the general question here involved: Dougherty v. Bank, 93 Pa. 227, and Warner v. Hare, 154 Pa. 548.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The judgment in this case is affirmed on the opinion of the court below; see also,Union National Bank v. Iron Co., 3 Sadler 58; Lancaster County National Bank v. Huver, 114 Pa. 216, where, at page 219 of the latter, the distinction between decisions in which the rights of third parties have intervened and those concerning the rights of the original parties; is recognized; and, as bearing on the general question here involved: Dougherty v. Bank, 93 Pa. 227, and Warner v. Hare, 154 Pa. 548.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 A. 371, 270 Pa. 284, 1921 Pa. LEXIS 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mccloskey-v-north-penn-bank-pa-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack