Warner v. A. G. Anderson, Inc.

3 N.W.2d 673, 212 Minn. 610, 1942 Minn. LEXIS 673
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided May 8, 1942·No. No. 33,185.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This matter is purportedly before us upon a writ of certiorari to review a judgment of the municipal court of Duluth adverse to relator. However, we are not authorized to review it. By statute, a party may appeal from a judgment of the municipal court of Duluth “upon the same grounds and in like manner, and upon like proceedings” as in the case of appeals from the district court to the supreme court. L. 1923, c. 238, §. 47; amended, L. 1937, c. 143. “A judgment * * * in a civil action in a district court may be removed to the supreme court by appeal, as provided in this chapter, and not otherwise.” Mason St. 1927, § 9490. Review by certiorari is thus excluded. The writ, having been improvidently issued, must be quashed. State ex rel. Village of Buhl v. District Court, 136 Minn. 461, 161 N. W. 1055; Neumann v. Edwards, 146 Minn. 179, 178 N. W. 589.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Warner v. A. G. Anderson, Inc., 3 N.W.2d 673, 212 Minn. 610, 1942 Minn. LEXIS 673 (Mich. 1942).

3 N.W.2d 673 (Warner v. A. G. Anderson, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Warner v. A. G. Anderson, Inc.
7 N.W.2d 7 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1942)
Feder v. Modern Woodmen of America
3 N.W.2d 673 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1942)