Ware v. Boyles

District Court, E.D. Missouri·Decided September 18, 2025·No. 4:25-cv-01185·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION SUPASTAR WARE, ) Plaintiff, v. No. 4:25-CV-01185 SPM JOHN BOYLES, et al., Defendants. OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. [ECF No. 41]. When the Court dismissed this action, it certified in writing that an appeal would not be taken in good faith, see ECF Nos. 36 and 37; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), and it is not apparent that plaintiff now seeks appellate review of any issue that is not frivolous. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 445 (1962). As a result, the Court will deny the motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [ECF No. 41] is DENIED. Dated this 18" day of September, 2025.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ware v. Boyles, (E.D. Mo. 2025).

Ware v. Boyles (Ware v. Boyles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)