Ward v. Ward

85 So. 181, 123 Miss. 217
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ward v. Ward. Read the opinion of the Court — 124 Miss. 697
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1920·No. No. 21320·Published

Opinion

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court. _

This cause comes on to be heard on the motion of the appellee to strike the stenographer’s transcript of the evidence from the record. The only ground of the motion that will be herein specifically referred to is that the stenographer resigned his office before he filed the transcript, consequently his certificate thereto' is without official sanction. Under the provisions of section 4795, Code of 1906 (Section 3148, Hemingway’s Code), the resignation of a stenographer is ineffective in so far as it relates to any business connected with his office, upon the discharge of which he has entered and which is unfinished;

Overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ward v. Ward, 85 So. 181, 123 Miss. 217 (Mich. 1920).

85 So. 181 (Ward v. Ward) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.