Ward v. Ward

Mississippi Supreme Court

Ward v. Ward

85 So. 181, 123 Miss. 217

CourtMississippi Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 15, 1920

DocketNo. 21320

StatusPublished

This text of 85 So. 181 (Ward v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ward v. Ward, 85 So. 181, 123 Miss. 217 (Mich. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court. _

This cause comes on to be heard on the motion of the appellee to strike the stenographer’s transcript of the evidence from the record. The only ground of the motion that will be herein specifically referred to is that the stenographer resigned his office before he filed the transcript, consequently his certificate thereto' is without official sanction. Under the provisions of section 4795, Code of 1906 (Section 3148, Hemingway’s Code), the resignation of a stenographer is ineffective in so far as it relates to any business connected with his office, upon the discharge of which he has entered and which is unfinished;

Overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court. _

This cause comes on to be heard on the motion of the appellee to strike the stenographer’s transcript of the evidence from the record. The only ground of the motion that will be herein specifically referred to is that the stenographer resigned his office before he filed the transcript, consequently his certificate thereto' is without official sanction. Under the provisions of section 4795, Code of 1906 (Section 3148, Hemingway’s Code), the resignation of a stenographer is ineffective in so far as it relates to any business connected with his office, upon the discharge of which he has entered and which is unfinished;

Overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 So. 181, 123 Miss. 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-ward-miss-1920.