Ward v. State

333 S.E.2d 669, 175 Ga. App. 410, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 2106
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 10, 1985
Docket70290
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 333 S.E.2d 669 (Ward v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ward v. State, 333 S.E.2d 669, 175 Ga. App. 410, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 2106 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

Sognier, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of driving at an excessive speed and appeals. He enumerates several errors relating to jurisdiction of the trial court, denial of counsel, denial of various motions and lack of evidence to support his conviction.

1. Appellant was found guilty of driving 75 miles per hour in a 55 mile per hour zone. Driving in excess of 55 miles per hour is a misdemeanor, OCGA §§ 40-6-181 (b) (2); 40-6-1, and State courts have jurisdiction to try misdemeanors. OCGA § 15-7-4. Since appellant’s traffic violation occurred in Clayton County, the State Court of that county had jurisdiction to try appellant. OCGA § 15-7-4 (1). See also Pfeiffer v. State, 173 Ga. App. 374 (1) (326 SE2d 562) (1985).

2. In regard to alleged errors in denial of appellant’s various motions and his request for appointment of a specific counsel, the record reflects that a hearing on these matters was held on November 16, 1984. Appellant failed to appear or provide any legal excuse for his absence; therefore, the court dismissed appellant’s motion and the other relief prayed for by appellant was denied. One cannot complain of a ruling made by the court which his own procedure or conduct aided in causing. Shirley v. State, 166 Ga. App. 456, 457 (2a) (304 *411 SE2d 468) (1983).

Decided July 10, 1985. Elwin Jay Ward, pro se. John Carbo III, Solicitor, Deborah M. Coghlan, Assistant Solicitor, for appellee.

3. There is no transcript of the trial and in the absence of a transcript, we cannot consider enumerations of error based on the evidence and proceedings at trial. Adams v. State, 142 Ga. App. 252, 255 (7) (235 SE2d 667) (1977); Tauber v. State, 168 Ga. App. 53 (308 SE2d 419) (1983). Thus, we affirm.

Judgment affirmed.

Birdsong, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tyson v. State
361 S.E.2d 386 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Noeske v. State
353 S.E.2d 635 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Jackson v. State
349 S.E.2d 252 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Calhoun v. State
346 S.E.2d 131 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
333 S.E.2d 669, 175 Ga. App. 410, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 2106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-state-gactapp-1985.