Ward v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Ward v. State

208 S.E.2d 611, 132 Ga. App. 597, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1756

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 16, 1974

Docket49519

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 208 S.E.2d 611 (Ward v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ward v. State, 208 S.E.2d 611, 132 Ga. App. 597, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1756 (Ga. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Evans, Judge.

The defendant was indicted, tried and convicted of burglary. He was sentenced to serve fifteen years. Motion [598]*598for new trial was filed and denied. Defendant appeals. Held:

Submitted July 9, 1974 Decided September 16, 1974. James C. Carr, Jr., for appellant. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Richard E. Hicks, Joel M. Feldman, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.

Rita Woods, the victim, testified that she left her apartment locked, returned later to find her front door jammed or held so that she could not enter, heard voices inside, went around to the back door and found it open. She later saw defendant (whom she did not then know, but now recognizes in court), carrying her television set. She screamed, defendant dropped the television set and ran. Another person ran from behind her back steps as she entered her back door. Both her bathroom and kitchen windows were open. They were not open when she left earlier.

This evidence, though circumstantial as to the defendant with the stolen television outside the apartment, is sufficient to support the verdict of guilty. Anderson v. State, 119 Ga. App. 421 (167 SE2d 225); Summerlin v. State, 109 Ga. App. 91 (135 SE2d 594). The case differs on its facts from that of Williamson v. State, 38 Ga. App. 267 (143 SE 795), cited by defendant, in that the stolen article (television set) was found in possession of the defendant immediately after the victim found her apartment burglarized and just outside of the apartment. The general grounds of the motion for new trial are not meritorious.

Judgment affirmed.

Panned, P. J., and Webb, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans, Judge.

The defendant was indicted, tried and convicted of burglary. He was sentenced to serve fifteen years. Motion [598]*598for new trial was filed and denied. Defendant appeals. Held:

Submitted July 9, 1974 Decided September 16, 1974. James C. Carr, Jr., for appellant. Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Richard E. Hicks, Joel M. Feldman, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.

Rita Woods, the victim, testified that she left her apartment locked, returned later to find her front door jammed or held so that she could not enter, heard voices inside, went around to the back door and found it open. She later saw defendant (whom she did not then know, but now recognizes in court), carrying her television set. She screamed, defendant dropped the television set and ran. Another person ran from behind her back steps as she entered her back door. Both her bathroom and kitchen windows were open. They were not open when she left earlier.

This evidence, though circumstantial as to the defendant with the stolen television outside the apartment, is sufficient to support the verdict of guilty. Anderson v. State, 119 Ga. App. 421 (167 SE2d 225); Summerlin v. State, 109 Ga. App. 91 (135 SE2d 594). The case differs on its facts from that of Williamson v. State, 38 Ga. App. 267 (143 SE 795), cited by defendant, in that the stolen article (television set) was found in possession of the defendant immediately after the victim found her apartment burglarized and just outside of the apartment. The general grounds of the motion for new trial are not meritorious.

Judgment affirmed.

Panned, P. J., and Webb, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 S.E.2d 611, 132 Ga. App. 597, 1974 Ga. App. LEXIS 1756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-state-gactapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack