Williamson v. State
143 S.E. 795, 38 Ga. App. 267, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 179
Opinion
The accused was indicted for burglary. Upon the .trial the State relied entirely upon the contention that some of the articles stolen from the house during the burglary were found in his recent possession. However, the evidence failed to establish that any of the articles so found were the fruits of the burglary. It follows that his conviction was unauthorized, and that the refusal to grant him a new trial was error.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Williamson v. State, 143 S.E. 795, 38 Ga. App. 267, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 179 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).
143 S.E. 795 (Williamson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ward v. State
208 S.E.2d 611 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)