Ward v. State

638 So. 2d 1060, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6628, 1994 WL 288069
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ward v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 636 So. 2d 68
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 1, 1994·No. No. 94-313·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Ward’s conviction and sentences for attempted first degree murder, two counts of robbery with a firearm, and aggravated battery. See State v. Jones, 536 So.2d 1161 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). However, the trial court improperly imposed attorney’s fees against Ward because he was not notified of his right to a hearing to contest the amount, as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.720(d)(1). See Smith v. State, 622 So.2d 638 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993). Accordingly, we quash the $2,600.00 hen imposed against Ward for attorney’s fees without prejudice to the reimposition of the hen upon remand after comphance with rule 3.720(d)(1).

AFFIRMED; Lien QUASHED and REMANDED.

W. SHARP, GOSHORN and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ward v. State, 638 So. 2d 1060, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6628, 1994 WL 288069 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

638 So. 2d 1060 (Ward v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
622 So. 2d 638 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
State v. Jones
536 So. 2d 1161 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)