Ward v. State
This text of 598 So. 2d 331 (Ward v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ward raises various constitutional challenges to the habitual violent felony offender sentences imposed following his convictions on three counts of attempted armed robbery. We have rejected each of these challenges in many prior decisions, and we do so again. However, as we did in Tillman v. State, 586 So.2d 1269 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), we certify the following question to be of great public importance:
DOES SECTION 775.084(l)(b) VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION AGAINST DOUBLE JEOPARDY BY INCREASING A DEFENDANT’S PUNISHMENT DUE TO THE NATURE OF A PRIOR OFFENSE?
Nevertheless, we remand this cause to the trial court to correct clerical errors in the judgment and sentence forms. The [332]*332judgment should be corrected to indicate that the attempted armed robberies are second degree felonies, and the sentence forms should be corrected to indicate that the trial judge imposed concurrent ten-year minimum mandatory sentences for the attempted armed robberies.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
598 So. 2d 331, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6200, 1992 WL 114646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.