Ward v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ward v. State

429 So. 2d 825, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19076

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 13, 1983

DocketNo. 82-1880

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 429 So. 2d 825 (Ward v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ward v. State, 429 So. 2d 825, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19076 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Appellant pleaded nolo contendere to three separate crimes: resisting an officer with violence, battery of a law enforcement officer, and false report to a law enforcement officer. The court imposed a general probation period of two years for all three offenses.

In Dorfman v. State, 351 So.2d 954 (Fla.1977), the Florida Supreme Court held that a single general sentence may not be imposed for two or more crimes. We, along with all but one of our sister courts, have extended the Dorfman rationale to prohibit general terms of probation for two or more offenses. Glanton v. State, 415 So.2d 909 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Jacques v. State, 414 So.2d 598 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Price v. State, 393 So.2d 69 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); and Pearson v. State, 371 So.2d 569 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).

Hence, we hold the trial court erred in imposing a general probation term on the offenses. Appellant is entitled to a set term of probation on each conviction. That way there can be no question as to appellant’s status at any given point in time.

Accordingly, the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to enter separate [826]*826probation orders for each offense committed by appellant.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Appellant pleaded nolo contendere to three separate crimes: resisting an officer with violence, battery of a law enforcement officer, and false report to a law enforcement officer. The court imposed a general probation period of two years for all three offenses.

In Dorfman v. State, 351 So.2d 954 (Fla.1977), the Florida Supreme Court held that a single general sentence may not be imposed for two or more crimes. We, along with all but one of our sister courts, have extended the Dorfman rationale to prohibit general terms of probation for two or more offenses. Glanton v. State, 415 So.2d 909 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Jacques v. State, 414 So.2d 598 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Price v. State, 393 So.2d 69 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); and Pearson v. State, 371 So.2d 569 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979).

Hence, we hold the trial court erred in imposing a general probation term on the offenses. Appellant is entitled to a set term of probation on each conviction. That way there can be no question as to appellant’s status at any given point in time.

Accordingly, the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to enter separate [826]*826probation orders for each offense committed by appellant.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

429 So. 2d 825, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 19076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-state-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack