Ward v. Griffin
Opinion
TNE’, : : □ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ee SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK pba eS os nnmnnnn cane anne □□ nanman cman nmannnnn K (OK. □□ CARLOS WARD, ey □□□ □ or Gbdjace Plaintiff, oe ~ -against- 19 CIVIL 4759 (VB) JUDGMENT THOMAS GRIFFIN, Assistant Commissioner; ALBERT ACRISH, Nurse Practitioner; FREDERICK N. BERNSTEIN, Medical Director, Defendants. ween nen een eee eee KX It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated June 29, 2020, defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York June 29, 2020
RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court
Deputy Clerk ,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ward v. Griffin (Ward v. Griffin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.