Ward v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ward v. Goord

43 A.D.3d 1257, 841 N.Y.S.2d 807

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 43 A.D.3d 1257 (Ward v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ward v. Goord, 43 A.D.3d 1257, 841 N.Y.S.2d 807 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Fetitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CFLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of counterfeiting. The Attorney General has advised this Court that such determination has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has been afforded all of the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is now dismissed as moot (see Matter of Lewis v Goord, 37 AD3d 917 [2007]).

Cardona, EJ, Crew III, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ, concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Fetitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CFLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of counterfeiting. The Attorney General has advised this Court that such determination has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has been afforded all of the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is now dismissed as moot (see Matter of Lewis v Goord, 37 AD3d 917 [2007]).

Cardona, EJ, Crew III, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ, concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A.D.3d 1257, 841 N.Y.S.2d 807, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ward-v-goord-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack