Jackson v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jackson v. Brown

48 A.D.3d 853, 849 N.Y.S.2d 810

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 7, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 48 A.D.3d 853 (Jackson v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jackson v. Brown, 48 A.D.3d 853, 849 N.Y.S.2d 810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier II disciplinary determination finding him guilty of interference with an employee and harassment. The Attorney General has advised this Court that, during the pendency of this proceeding, the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Accordingly, inasmuch as petitioner has been provided all of the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is now dismissed as moot (see Matter of Ward v Goord, 43 AD3d 1257, 1257 [2007]).

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Malone Jr., [854]*854JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier II disciplinary determination finding him guilty of interference with an employee and harassment. The Attorney General has advised this Court that, during the pendency of this proceeding, the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Accordingly, inasmuch as petitioner has been provided all of the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is now dismissed as moot (see Matter of Ward v Goord, 43 AD3d 1257, 1257 [2007]).

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Malone Jr., [854]*854JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 A.D.3d 853, 849 N.Y.S.2d 810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-brown-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack