Ward v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Ward v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.

768 A.2d 1111, 564 Pa. 446, 2001 Pa. LEXIS 752

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 11, 2001·No. Direct appeal 71 MD 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of April, 2001, because we hold that New Jersey’s report contained adequate information for the Bureau of Driver Licensing to complete its duties and that section 1584 of the Motor Vehicle Code is constitutional, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County is [447]*447reversed and the case is remanded to that court. See Harrington v. Commonwealth, 563 Pa. 565, 763 A.2d 386, 2000 Pa. Lexis 2991, and Crooks v. Commonwealth No. 70 M.D. Appeal Dkt. 2000, 2001 WL 359021.

Justice CAPPY files a concurring statement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 11th day of April, 2001, because we hold that New Jersey’s report contained adequate information for the Bureau of Driver Licensing to complete its duties and that section 1584 of the Motor Vehicle Code is constitutional, the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County is [447]*447reversed and the case is remanded to that court. See Harrington v. Commonwealth, 563 Pa. 565, 763 A.2d 386, 2000 Pa. Lexis 2991, and Crooks v. Commonwealth No. 70 M.D. Appeal Dkt. 2000, 2001 WL 359021.

Justice CAPPY files a concurring statement.

Ward v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP., 768 A.2d 1111, 564 Pa. 446, 2001 Pa. LEXIS 752 (Pa. 2001).

Pincite

768 A.2d 1111 (Ward v. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related