Waples-Painter Co. v. Board of Com'rs

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Waples-Painter Co. v. Board of Com'rs

1914 OK 547, 144 P. 353, 44 Okla. 212, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 674

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 10, 1914

Docket3839

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK 547 (Waples-Painter Co. v. Board of Com'rs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waples-Painter Co. v. Board of Com'rs, 1914 OK 547, 144 P. 353, 44 Okla. 212, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 674 (Okla. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

This appeal was filed in this court April 16, 1912. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evidence that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should, therefore, be dismissed for want of prosecution under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). Crone v. Duncan et al., 36 Olcla. 517, 129 Pac. 711; Nicholson v. Barnes 42 Okla. 250, 140 Pac. 1155.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

This appeal was filed in this court April 16, 1912. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evidence that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should, therefore, be dismissed for want of prosecution under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). Crone v. Duncan et al., 36 Olcla. 517, 129 Pac. 711; Nicholson v. Barnes 42 Okla. 250, 140 Pac. 1155.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK 547, 144 P. 353, 44 Okla. 212, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waples-painter-co-v-board-of-comrs-okla-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack