Waples-Painter Co. v. Board of Com'rs

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Waples-Painter Co. v. Board of Com'rs

1914 OK 547, 144 P. 353, 44 Okla. 212, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 674

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided November 10, 1914·No. 3839·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

This appeal was filed in this court April 16, 1912. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evidence that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should, therefore, be dismissed for want of prosecution under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). Crone v. Duncan et al., 36 Olcla. 517, 129 Pac. 711; Nicholson v. Barnes 42 Okla. 250, 140 Pac. 1155.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

RITTENHOUSE, C.

This appeal was filed in this court April 16, 1912. Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evidence that the proceedings have been abandoned. The appeal should, therefore, be dismissed for want of prosecution under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). Crone v. Duncan et al., 36 Olcla. 517, 129 Pac. 711; Nicholson v. Barnes 42 Okla. 250, 140 Pac. 1155.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Waples-Painter Co. v. Board of Com'rs, 1914 OK 547, 144 P. 353, 44 Okla. 212, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 674 (Okla. 1914).

Pincite

1914 OK 547 (Waples-Painter Co. v. Board of Com'rs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related