Crone v. Duncan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Crone v. Duncan

1913 OK 10, 129 P. 711, 36 Okla. 517, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 903

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 7, 1913·No. 2484·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

The petition in error, with case-made attached, was filed in this court April 3, 1911. The cause was duly assigned for hearing at the December, 1912, term, and, being reached in due course on the calendar, it appears that no briefs have been filed as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 9o Pac. vi).

It follows that the appeal should be'dismissed for want of prosecution.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

The petition in error, with case-made attached, was filed in this court April 3, 1911. The cause was duly assigned for hearing at the December, 1912, term, and, being reached in due course on the calendar, it appears that no briefs have been filed as required by rule 7 of this court (20 Okla. viii, 9o Pac. vi).

It follows that the appeal should be'dismissed for want of prosecution.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Crone v. Duncan, 1913 OK 10, 129 P. 711, 36 Okla. 517, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 903 (Okla. 1913).

Pincite

1913 OK 10 (Crone v. Duncan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related