Walz v. Paul Helfer, Inc.

36 N.E.2d 640, 286 N.Y. 408, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1455
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 29, 1941·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*410 Per Curiam.

The record presents issues of fact concerning negligence and freedom from contributory negligence. The washing of the floor of a store during business hours presents a different situation from the cleaning of the stairs of an apartment house (Samuels v. Terry Holding Co., 253 N. Y. 593) or the floor of a railroad station (Curtiss v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 233 N. Y. 554).

The judgments should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. (See 286 N. Y. 700.)

Loughran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ., concur; Lehman, Ch. J., dissents.

Judgments reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walz v. Paul Helfer, Inc., 36 N.E.2d 640, 286 N.Y. 408, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 1455 (N.Y. 1941).

36 N.E.2d 640 (Walz v. Paul Helfer, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Surface v. Safeway Stores, Inc.
169 F.2d 937 (Eighth Circuit, 1948)
Walz v. Paul Helfer, Inc.
37 N.E.2d 142 (New York Court of Appeals, 1941)