Walters v. State

30 So. 3d 656, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3326, 2010 WL 934217
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 17, 2010·No. 3D08-1518·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Manuel Walters appeals his conviction for second-degree murder, asserting fundamental error in the standard manslaughter by act instruction given to the jury. 1 See Fla. Std. Jury Instr. (Crim.) 7.7. We affirm the conviction. See Valdes-Pino v. State, 23 So.3d 871, 872 (Fla. 3d DCA *657 2009). However, to preserve the defendant’s rights, we certify direct conflict with Montgomery v. State, — So.3d —, 2009 WL 350624 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009), which currently is pending review before the Florida Supreme Court. State v. Montgomery, 11 So.3d 943 (Fla.2009).

Conviction affirmed, conflict certified.

1

. The defendant's remaining two points of appeal are without merit. See Irving v. State, 627 So.2d 92, 94 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) ("A trial court has wide discretion concerning the admissibility of evidence, and a ruling on admissibility will not be disturbed unless there has been an abuse of discretion.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walters v. State, 30 So. 3d 656, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3326, 2010 WL 934217 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

30 So. 3d 656 (Walters v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walters v. State
217 So. 3d 175 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Martinez v. State
30 So. 3d 656 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)