Walters v. State

229 So. 3d 444
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 31, 2017·No. CASE NO. 1D17-3209·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant filed a rulé1 3.800(a) motion raising' several arguments challenging the legality of his sentences fdr possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and aggravated assault with possession and discharge of á firearm. We affirm the trial court’s conclusion that the sentences are legal, but write to note that the twenty-year sentence for the aggravated assault is legal because of the minimum-mandatory sentence provision of section 775,087(2)(a)2., Florida Statutes (2010). The offense is not subject to reclassification pursuant to section 775.087(1) because a firearm is an essential element of aggravated assault. See § 784.021(1)(a). See Patterson v. State, 693 So.2d 74 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ„ CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walters v. State, 229 So. 3d 444 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

229 So. 3d 444 (Walters v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DAMON DARLING v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2022