Walter Mickens, Jr.,petitioner v. John B. Taylor, Warden, Sussex I State Prison,respondent

243 F.3d 870, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 4926, 2001 WL 300140
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 26, 2001
Docket00-4
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 243 F.3d 870 (Walter Mickens, Jr.,petitioner v. John B. Taylor, Warden, Sussex I State Prison,respondent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walter Mickens, Jr.,petitioner v. John B. Taylor, Warden, Sussex I State Prison,respondent, 243 F.3d 870, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 4926, 2001 WL 300140 (4th Cir. 2001).

Opinions

ORDER

We have considered Mickens’ motion to stay the issuance of our mandate and to stay the sentence of execution of the state court, which motion was filed in our court March 16, 2001, and we have considered the response thereto filed by the Commonwealth March 19, 2001.

Voting to grant the stay were Judges Michael, Motz and King, and voting to deny the stay were Judges Wilkinson, Widener, Wilkins, Niemeyer, Luttig, Williams and Traxler.

It is accordingly ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the motion of Mickens to stay the issuance of our mandate and to stay the sentence of execution by the state court shall be, and it hereby is, denied.

MICHAEL, J., joined by DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ and KING, JJ., filed a dissenting opinion, which follows:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 F.3d 870, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 4926, 2001 WL 300140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-mickens-jrpetitioner-v-john-b-taylor-warden-sussex-i-state-ca4-2001.