Walter M. Hinton v. United States

344 F.2d 543, 120 U.S. App. D.C. 158, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6214
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided March 17, 1965·No. 18829_1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On further consideration of appellant’s, motion for reduction of bail pending ap[544] peal, and of appellee’s opposition thereto, and on consideration of the memorandum of District Court Judge Youngdahl, 238 F.Supp. 230, filed pursuant to the order of remand entered herein on January 21,1965, it is

ORDERED by the Court that appellant’s motion for reduction of bail is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walter M. Hinton v. United States, 344 F.2d 543, 120 U.S. App. D.C. 158, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6214 (D.C. Cir. 1965).

344 F.2d 543 (Walter M. Hinton v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reeves v. State
411 P.2d 212 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1966)
Walter M. Hinton v. United States
344 F.2d 543 (D.C. Circuit, 1965)