Walter Jackson, Jr. v. State of Missouri

406 F. App'x 93
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 12, 2011
Docket10-3233
StatusUnpublished

This text of 406 F. App'x 93 (Walter Jackson, Jr. v. State of Missouri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walter Jackson, Jr. v. State of Missouri, 406 F. App'x 93 (8th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Walter Lee Jackson appeals the district court’s 1 order dismissing his unsigned 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute. In an earlier order, the court directed Jackson to sign the complaint or it would be dismissed without prejudice. After careful review, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint when Jackson failed to comply with its prior directive. See Boyle v. Am. Auto Serv., Inc., 571 F.3d 734, 742 (8th Cir.2009) (standard of review). Consistent with that directive, we clarify that the dismissal was without prejudice. As so clarified, the order of dismissal is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boyle v. American Auto Service, Inc.
571 F.3d 734 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
406 F. App'x 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walter-jackson-jr-v-state-of-missouri-ca8-2011.