Walt Disney World Co. v. May

397 So. 2d 1003, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19723
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 5, 1981
DocketVV-351
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 397 So. 2d 1003 (Walt Disney World Co. v. May) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walt Disney World Co. v. May, 397 So. 2d 1003, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19723 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

397 So.2d 1003 (1981)

WALT DISNEY WORLD COMPANY, Appellant,
v.
Mary Catherine Lathrop MAY, Appellee.

No. VV-351.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

May 5, 1981.

Lee G. Schmudde, Orlando, for appellant.

Bruce McEwan, and L. Edward McClellan, Jr., of Pattillo, MacKay & McKeever, Ocala, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a workers' compensation order awarding claimant temporary total disability benefits for the period January 4, 1980 to March 18, 1980 and an attorney's fee pursuant to Section 440.34(2)(c), Florida Statutes (1979). Walt Disney World contends the attorney's fee award was unjustified since it did not deny that an injury occurred for which compensation benefits are payable but merely disputed claimant's entitlement to benefits for the period January 4, 1980 to March 18, 1980. We agree.

The record is clear that Walt Disney World admitted this accident, provided all necessary remedial treatment, and paid temporary total disability benefits beginning March 18, 1980 when claimant was put in the hospital for her back condition. Based on the report of its in-house physician, Dr. Bourguignon, Walt Disney World withheld benefits for the disputed period believing that claimant was capable of returning to work. However, the Deputy Commissioner relying on claimant's testimony and that of her current treating physician disagreed with Walt Disney World's assessment of claimant's condition during this period. Nevertheless, this does not mandate an attorney's fee award under the language of the new 1979 statute. When an employer/carrier admits an accident and pays some disability benefits but denies others are due, an attorney's fee is not awardable under Section 440.34(2)(c) Florida Statutes (1979). Ardmore Farms, Inc. v. Squires, 395 So.2d 268 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).

*1004 Accordingly, that portion of the deputy's order awarding an attorney's fee is REVERSED.

BOOTH, SMITH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

HILLSBOROUGH CTY. SCHOOL BD. v. Hilburn
472 So. 2d 1309 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Singletary v. MANGHAM CONST. CO., INC.
471 So. 2d 635 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)
Rusty Pelican Restaurant v. Garcia
437 So. 2d 754 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
City of Tampa v. Kopkau
429 So. 2d 381 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
EC Goldman Roofing v. Rogers
418 So. 2d 426 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Harper Plumbing & Heating v. Boyd
418 So. 2d 396 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Sanlando Utility Corp. v. Morris
418 So. 2d 389 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
T. J. Chastain Farms v. Kusiak
414 So. 2d 1187 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Four Quarters Habitat, Inc. v. Miller
405 So. 2d 475 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
397 So. 2d 1003, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walt-disney-world-co-v-may-fladistctapp-1981.