Walshaw v. Irwin

161 F.2d 184, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2749
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 5, 1947·No. Nos. 9205, 9220·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Consideration of the briefs, the oral argument of the parties and the appendix convinces us that the court below did not commit any substantial error in refusing to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant and in refusing to grant a new trial to the plaintiff.

The judgment of the District Court, is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walshaw v. Irwin, 161 F.2d 184, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2749 (3d Cir. 1947).

161 F.2d 184 (Walshaw v. Irwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rivers v. Bauer
175 F.2d 774 (Third Circuit, 1949)