Rivers v. Bauer

Third Circuit

Rivers v. Bauer

175 F.2d 774, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2428

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJuly 29, 1949

DocketNos. 9884, 9920

StatusPublished

This text of 175 F.2d 774 (Rivers v. Bauer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rivers v. Bauer, 175 F.2d 774, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2428 (3d Cir. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Careful consideration of the record, the briefs and the arguments of the parties in the instant appeal convinces us that the court below rendered a correct decision. 79 F.Supp. 403. As to damages see our decision in Walshaw, Administratrix, v. Irwin, 3 Cir., 161 F.2d 184. As to damages for loss of consortium alleged by the husband plaintiff the evidence demonstrates this to have been too nebulous to warrant reversal. Accordingly the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Careful consideration of the record, the briefs and the arguments of the parties in the instant appeal convinces us that the court below rendered a correct decision. 79 F.Supp. 403. As to damages see our decision in Walshaw, Administratrix, v. Irwin, 3 Cir., 161 F.2d 184. As to damages for loss of consortium alleged by the husband plaintiff the evidence demonstrates this to have been too nebulous to warrant reversal. Accordingly the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 F.2d 774, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rivers-v-bauer-ca3-1949.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack