Rivers v. Bauer

Third Circuit

Rivers v. Bauer

175 F.2d 774, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2428

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided July 29, 1949·No. Nos. 9884, 9920·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Careful consideration of the record, the briefs and the arguments of the parties in the instant appeal convinces us that the court below rendered a correct decision. 79 F.Supp. 403. As to damages see our decision in Walshaw, Administratrix, v. Irwin, 3 Cir., 161 F.2d 184. As to damages for loss of consortium alleged by the husband plaintiff the evidence demonstrates this to have been too nebulous to warrant reversal. Accordingly the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Careful consideration of the record, the briefs and the arguments of the parties in the instant appeal convinces us that the court below rendered a correct decision. 79 F.Supp. 403. As to damages see our decision in Walshaw, Administratrix, v. Irwin, 3 Cir., 161 F.2d 184. As to damages for loss of consortium alleged by the husband plaintiff the evidence demonstrates this to have been too nebulous to warrant reversal. Accordingly the judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

Rivers v. Bauer, 175 F.2d 774, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 2428 (3d Cir. 1949).

Pincite

175 F.2d 774 (Rivers v. Bauer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related