Home/New Jersey Superior Court App Division/Walsh v. STATE, DEPT. OF TREASURY

Walsh v. STATE, DEPT. OF TREASURY

572 A.2d 222, 240 N.J. Super. 42
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedApril 10, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 572 A.2d 222 (Walsh v. STATE, DEPT. OF TREASURY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walsh v. STATE, DEPT. OF TREASURY, 572 A.2d 222, 240 N.J. Super. 42 (N.J. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

240 N.J. Super. 42 (1990)
572 A.2d 222

FRANK E. WALSH AND MARY D. WALSH, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued March 27, 1990.
Decided April 10, 1990.

Before Judges PRESSLER, LONG and LANDAU.

*43 Jeanne E. Gorrissen, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mary C. Jacobson, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel; Jeanne E. Gorrissen, on the brief).

John L. Berger argued the cause for respondents (Lowenstein, Sandler, Kohl, Fisher & Boylan, attorneys; Benedict M. Kohl and John L. Berger, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Tax Court setting aside the deficiency assessment of the Division of Taxation is affirmed, to the extent the assessment was based on plaintiffs' realization of capital gains from their sale of stock in Subchapter S corporations, substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Lasser in his opinion reported at 10 N.J. Tax 447 (Tax Ct. 1989). Since the parties agree that the deficiency assessment is correct in respect of other taxpayer liabilities, we remand to the Tax Court for entry of a modified judgment so providing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ANDREW J. SHECHTEL VS. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION (TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2020
Cohen v. State
28 N.J. Tax 548 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2015)
Toyota Motor Credit Corp. v. Director, Division of Taxation
28 N.J. Tax 96 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2014)
Aciu v. Director
26 N.J. Tax 532 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2012)
Moroney v. Director, Division of Taxation
868 A.2d 1132 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2005)
Moroney v. Director, Division of Taxation
21 N.J. Tax 220 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2004)
Reck v. Director, Div. of Taxation
785 A.2d 476 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2001)
Miller v. Director, Division of Taxation
19 N.J. Tax 522 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2001)
Sidman v. Director, Division of Taxation
18 N.J. Tax 636 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2000)
Koch v. Director, Division of Taxation
722 A.2d 918 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1999)
Sabino v. Director
686 A.2d 1197 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1996)
Stella A. Schaevitz Trust v. Director, Division of Taxation
15 N.J. Tax 296 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1995)
Spinella v. Director
13 N.J. Tax 305 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1993)
Vasudev v. Director
13 N.J. Tax 223 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1993)
Laurite v. Director, Division of Taxation
12 N.J. Tax 483 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
572 A.2d 222, 240 N.J. Super. 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walsh-v-state-dept-of-treasury-njsuperctappdiv-1990.