Walsh v. Krevolin

8 Conn. Super. Ct. 255
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided June 4, 1940·No. File No. 58740·Published

Opinion

I find that my offhand impression of this plea in abatement does not accord with precedent. The proceedings will abate "if it appear that the suit was commenced before the cause of action had accrued." Southey vs. Dowling,70 Conn. 153, 157. So far as the signing of the plea is concerned,Wilcox vs. Chambers, 34 Conn. 179, seems sufficiently broad to cover the signing in this case in view of the special appearance that was entered.

While without much doubt the matter could be pleaded in bar upon the foregoing authority and for the reasons stated in the plea upon which the demurrer sufficiently raises a question of law, the plea is sustained and the suit may abate and be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walsh v. Krevolin, 8 Conn. Super. Ct. 255 (Colo. Ct. App. 1940).

8 Conn. Super. Ct. 255 (Walsh v. Krevolin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilcox v. Chambers
34 Conn. 179 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1867)
Southey v. Dowling
39 A. 113 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1898)