Walsh v. Krevolin

8 Conn. Super. Ct. 255
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedJune 4, 1940
DocketFile No. 58740
StatusPublished

This text of 8 Conn. Super. Ct. 255 (Walsh v. Krevolin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walsh v. Krevolin, 8 Conn. Super. Ct. 255 (Colo. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

I find that my offhand impression of this plea in abatement does not accord with precedent. The proceedings will abate "if it appear that the suit was commenced before the cause of action had accrued." Southey vs. Dowling,70 Conn. 153, 157. So far as the signing of the plea is concerned,Wilcox vs. Chambers, 34 Conn. 179, seems sufficiently broad to cover the signing in this case in view of the special appearance that was entered.

While without much doubt the matter could be pleaded in bar upon the foregoing authority and for the reasons stated in the plea upon which the demurrer sufficiently raises a question of law, the plea is sustained and the suit may abate and be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilcox v. Chambers
34 Conn. 179 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1867)
Southey v. Dowling
39 A. 113 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Conn. Super. Ct. 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walsh-v-krevolin-connsuperct-1940.