WALLMULLER v. Uttecht

249 P.3d 1015, 171 Wash. 2d 1016, 2011 Wash. LEXIS 374
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 3, 2011
Docket85400-9
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 249 P.3d 1015 (WALLMULLER v. Uttecht) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
WALLMULLER v. Uttecht, 249 P.3d 1015, 171 Wash. 2d 1016, 2011 Wash. LEXIS 374 (Wash. 2011).

Opinion

249 P.3d 1015 (2011)

Frank A. WALLMULLER, Appellant,
v.
Jeffrey A. UTTECHT, Respondent.

No. 85400-9.

Supreme Court of Washington.

March 3, 2011.

ORDER

Frank Wallmuller filed a motion in this Court for an expenditure of public funds to enable him to appeal a superior court order dismissing his habeas corpus petition as frivolous. Department One of this Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen, and Justices Charles Johnson, Chambers, Fairhurst, and Stephens, considered the motion at its March 1, 2011, Motion Calendar and unanimously agreed that the superior court should have transferred the habeas corpus petition to the Court of Appeals for treatment as a personal restraint petition pursuant to CrR 7.8(c)(2), that the habeas corpus petition should therefore be transferred to this Court for treatment as a personal restraint petition, and that the petition should be dismissed as frivolous. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

(1) The motion for expenditure of public funds is denied.
(2) The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is transferred to this Court for treatment as a personal restraint petition.
(3) The petition is dismissed.

For the Court

/s/ Madsen, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Sandoval
249 P.3d 1015 (Washington Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
249 P.3d 1015, 171 Wash. 2d 1016, 2011 Wash. LEXIS 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallmuller-v-uttecht-wash-2011.