Wallin v. State
This text of 143 S.E. 597 (Wallin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
“The verdict in this case is dependent entirely on circumstantial evidence. The proved facts are consistent with innocence, and are insufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused. Suspicion of guilt will not authorize a conviction. Penal Code (1910), § 1010; Williams v. State, 113 Ga. 721 (39 S. E. 487).” Henderson v. State, 147 Ga. 134(2) (92 S. E. 871). The foregoing ruling is controlling in the instant case, and the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
143 S.E. 597, 38 Ga. App. 194, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallin-v-state-gactapp-1928.