Wallin v. State
143 S.E. 597, 38 Ga. App. 194, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 126
Opinion
“The verdict in this case is dependent entirely on circumstantial evidence. The proved facts are consistent with innocence, and are insufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused. Suspicion of guilt will not authorize a conviction. Penal Code (1910), § 1010; Williams v. State, 113 Ga. 721 (39 S. E. 487).” Henderson v. State, 147 Ga. 134(2) (92 S. E. 871). The foregoing ruling is controlling in the instant case, and the court erred in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wallin v. State, 143 S.E. 597, 38 Ga. App. 194, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 126 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).
143 S.E. 597 (Wallin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Crane v. State
180 S.E.2d 289 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1971)