Waller v. State

648 S.W.2d 308, 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 988
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 13, 1983
Docket67758
StatusPublished
Cited by30 cases

This text of 648 S.W.2d 308 (Waller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waller v. State, 648 S.W.2d 308, 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 988 (Tex. 1983).

Opinions

OPINION

DALLY, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of burglary of a building; V.T. C.A. Penal Code, Section 30.02; the punishment is imprisonment for 10 years.

V.T.C.A. Penal Code, Section 30.02(a)(1) provides:

“A person commits an offense if, without the effective consent of the owner, he: enters a habitation, or a building (or any portion of a building) not then open to the public, with intent to commit a felony or theft,”

Although raised neither in the trial court nor on appeal, we are confronted with an indictment which is fundamentally defective under our holding in Ex parte Prestridge, 605 S.W.2d 922 (Tex.Cr.App.1980). In that case, in which there was a collateral attack on the judgment, we held that the indictment was fundamentally defective. It was there said:

“It is essential to the offense of burglary of a building that the building entered not be open to the public.... The indictment is fundamentally defective for failing to allege that the building entered was not then open to the public. Compare Garza v. State, 522 S.W.2d 693 (Tex.Cr.App.1975); Johnson v. State, 537 S.W.2d 16 (Tex.Cr.App.1976).”

In the indictment in the instant case it is alleged the appellant on or about September 27, 1979: “did unlawfully intentionally and knowingly enter a building without the effective consent of Ethel Phillips, the owner, and therein attempted to commit and committed theft,” The indictment does not allege that the building was not open to the public, a necessary element of the offense of burglary of a building. Since the indict[310]*310ment does not allege an element of the offense it is fatally defective and reversal is required. Ex parte Prestridge, supra; cf. Allison v. State, 618 S.W.2d 763 (Tex.Cr.App.1981).

The judgment is reversed and the indictment is ordered dismissed.

Opinion approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ACOSTA, HECTOR v. the State of Texas
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2024
Meagan Rena Work v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2020
Jarrett Delaine Driver v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009
Johnson, Christopher Deon v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000
Jessup v. State
935 S.W.2d 508 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
McFarland v. State
928 S.W.2d 482 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Joseff Deon White v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 1993
Reyes Guadalupe Castaneda, Jr. v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 1993
Sanchez v. State
842 S.W.2d 732 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)
Straughter v. State
801 S.W.2d 607 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1990)
Cureton v. State
800 S.W.2d 259 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1990)
Port v. State
791 S.W.2d 103 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1990)
Bartley v. State
789 S.W.2d 288 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1990)
Perkins v. State
779 S.W.2d 918 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1989)
Harrison v. State
766 S.W.2d 600 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1989)
Niehouse v. State
761 S.W.2d 491 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Pyles v. State
755 S.W.2d 98 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Little v. State
758 S.W.2d 551 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1988)
Cook v. State
741 S.W.2d 928 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Love v. State
730 S.W.2d 385 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
648 S.W.2d 308, 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waller-v-state-texcrimapp-1983.