Waller v. State
117 S.E. 115, 30 Ga. App. 129, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 305
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Waller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 Ga. App. 674 →
Opinion
This case is here upon the sole assignment of error that the evidence does not authorize the verdict. Upon conflicting evidence, the verdict of the. jury was abundantly authorized. The court having approved the verdict, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
■Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Waller v. State, 117 S.E. 115, 30 Ga. App. 129, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 305 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).
117 S.E. 115 (Waller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.