Waller v. State

113 S.E. 39, 28 Ga. App. 754, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 832
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Waller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ga. App. 347
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 11, 1922·No. 13620·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

The sole assignment of error is that the evidence does not authorize the verdict. There is ample evidence to authorize the conviction, and the verdict having the approval of the trial judge, it was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Waller v. State, 113 S.E. 39, 28 Ga. App. 754, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 832 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

113 S.E. 39 (Waller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.