Wallace v. State

679 So. 2d 841, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9669, 1996 WL 511534
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 11, 1996·No. No. 96-01666·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Brian Wallaee appeals from the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to- Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We find no merit to Wallace’s first four points and therefore affirm as to those issues. However, we cannot determine from the record whether there is any merit to Wallace’s allegation that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate potential alibi witnesses. Since Wallace’s allegations are sufficient to require an evidentiary hearing on this issue, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

PATTERSON, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wallace v. State, 679 So. 2d 841, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 9669, 1996 WL 511534 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

679 So. 2d 841 (Wallace v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carter v. State
687 So. 2d 1321 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)