Wallace v. State

638 So. 2d 201, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6139, 1994 WL 275833
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wallace v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 618 So. 2d 797
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 21, 1994·No. No. 93-449·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In a direct appeal from his judgments of conviction and sentences for attempted first degree murder and attempted robbery, defendant argues that he was denied effective assistance of trial counsel. “[A] claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is a collateral matter which should be brought as a motion for post-conviction relief. Such a claim may not be raised for the first time on direct appeal, unless the facts giving rise to the claim are apparent on the face of the record, or conflict of interest or prejudice to the defendant is shown.” Gregory v. State, 588 So.2d 676 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (citations omitted). The exceptions to that rule are not present in this case.

Accordingly, we affirm. However, our holding is without prejudice to defendant to raise these claims in a motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wallace v. State, 638 So. 2d 201, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6139, 1994 WL 275833 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

638 So. 2d 201 (Wallace v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gregory v. State
588 So. 2d 676 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)