Wallace v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wallace v. State

389 So. 2d 10, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17810

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 21, 1980·No. No. 80-1640·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his- motion is affirmed. See: State v. Reasbeck, 359 So.2d 564 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970); Rule 3.170(g), Fla.R.Crim.P.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his- motion is affirmed. See: State v. Reasbeck, 359 So.2d 564 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970); Rule 3.170(g), Fla.R.Crim.P.

Wallace v. State, 389 So. 2d 10, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 17810 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

389 So. 2d 10 (Wallace v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related