Wallace v. SAKS FIFTH AVENUE, ATLANTA, INC.
This text of 350 S.E.2d 308 (Wallace v. SAKS FIFTH AVENUE, ATLANTA, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant obtained a judgment against Elaine J. Melnick and subsequently filed a garnishment action against appellee, Melnick’s employer. A default judgment was obtained against appellee. Thereafter the trial court entered an order granting appellee’s motion to open the default judgment. Appellant filed a direct appeal from that order. Held:
“OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (4) provides that in cases involving garnishment, except for all judgments or orders granting or refusing applications for attachment against fraudulent debtors which are directly appealable under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (5) (such judgments or orders are not in issue here), an application for appeal must be taken. Inasmuch as appellant has failed to obtain an order of this court permitting the filing of an appeal pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (4), the appeal must be dismissed. [Cit.]” Murdock v. Bank of America &c., 177 Ga. App. 409, 410 (339 SE2d 392) (1985).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
350 S.E.2d 308, 180 Ga. App. 679, 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 2263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallace-v-saks-fifth-avenue-atlanta-inc-gactapp-1986.