Wallace v. McClendon

1930 OK 305, 289 P. 354, 144 Okla. 39, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 647
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJune 17, 1930
Docket21309
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 1930 OK 305 (Wallace v. McClendon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wallace v. McClendon, 1930 OK 305, 289 P. 354, 144 Okla. 39, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 647 (Okla. 1930).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by J. W. Wallace, county treasurer of Atoka county, from a judgment of the district court enjoining plaintiff in error, as such county treasurer, from selling at resale,' April 21, 1929, real estate of the defendants in error and others similarly situated for taxes due thereon, delinquent and unpaid and upon which previous sales have' been made to Atoka county at delinquent tax sales.

The defendants in error have filed herein their motion to dismiss the appeal upon the grounds the questions involved in this appeal have become moot for the reason the time fixed by law for holding of such resales for the year 1930 has passed and no legal sale can now be had in this year.

An examination of the record presented in this appeal discloses such sale was advertised for April 21, 1930, the date required by law therefor, and that such resale was not begun on said day, and from which it now appears that the time for holding such resale has passed and the question presented by this appeal has become moot. Under this condition the rule of law announced in the cases of Thompson v. Board of Com’rs, Delaware Co., 56 Okla. 79, 155 Pac. 881; Delaware County v. Board of Com’rs., 56 Okla. 81, 155 Pac. 881; Drummond v. City of Ada, 86 Okla. 32, 206 Pac. 200; Arinwine v. Sawner, 112 Okla. 252, 240 Pac. 1042; Town of Covington v. Coberly, 136 Okla. 20, 275 Pac. 1064; State ex rel. Freeman v. Champion, 92 Okla. 282, 219 Pac. 90; Parrish v. School District No. 19, 68 Okla. 42, *40 171 Pac. 461, is applicable, and tbe appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Initiative Petition No. 366, State Question No. 689
2002 OK 21 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2002)
Breeding v. NJH Enterprises, LLC.
1997 OK 65 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1997)
City of Oklahoma City v. Oklahoma Tax Commission
789 P.2d 1287 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1990)
Abel v. Madden
1987 OK 55 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1987)
Rogers v. Excise Bd. of Greer County
1984 OK 95 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1984)
Oliver v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board
1961 OK 9 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1961)
Stinson v. Mobley
1939 OK 153 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1939)
Wallace v. Gassaway
1931 OK 210 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)
Emrick v. State Highway Commission
1931 OK 59 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1930 OK 305, 289 P. 354, 144 Okla. 39, 1930 Okla. LEXIS 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wallace-v-mcclendon-okla-1930.